A Presbyterian’s Reflection on the “Rise and Fall of Mars Hill”

I recently listened to a riveting and sobering podcast, produced by Christianity Today, called the “Rise and Fall of Mars Hill” about Mark Driscoll and the collapse of his Reformed-leaning megachurch in Seattle called Mars Hill. It was especially fascinating for me as a pastor and church planter because I lived through the height of Driscoll’s popularity in my college years. And, though I was never a fan of Mark Driscoll personally, I attended a retreat at a church that initially funded Mars Hill, I once had dinner with a pastor from Mars Hill, and I have many friends who planted churches through Acts 29, a network once associated with Mars Hill. Thus, the podcast hit very close to home.

But what are my reflections after listening? There are a lot of things that could be said. And this article isn’t a comprehensive review of the podcast (If you’re interested in more, I found this article from 9 Marks very helpful). 

But as a Presbyterian minister, I kept coming back to this thought over and over again: “If only they had the BCO...” 

Now, as I say that, I imagine Presbyterian ministers laughing and many others saying, “What in the world are you talking about?” For those who don’t know, BCO stands for “Book of Church Order.” You can read it here if you’re interested. It is a dense and wise document that guides the government, discipline, and worship of my denomination, the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA). In fact, it is divided into three sections: The Form of Government, the Rules of Discipline, and the Directory for the Worship of God. 

As a side note, the BCO was the weakest subject for my ordination exams back in 2015. I did a great job on history, theology, and Bible but nearly failed the BCO. But since that time, I’ve come to see the wisdom and importance of this book. Though its details often seem tedious, it is indispensable for the church. Thus – “if only Mars Hill had the BCO!” 

Though a reformed-leaning church, Mars Hill was not confessionally Reformed. They didn’t have a BCO or a presbytery to hold Mark Driscoll accountable. And in my view, they had an unbiblical form of church government. I don’t believe the wisdom of Presbyterianism is simply a human invention – it flows out of the wisdom of Scripture itself.

Of course, Presbyterian churches aren’t immune to scandal. I am not saying that the BCO is a substitute for godly Christian character (See 1 Timothy 3). As many Presbyterians can attest, the BCO can become a weapon in the hand of a contentious and litigious person. It’s not an inerrant document. It’s not equal to Scripture. And really, nothing is a substitute for godly Christian character, flowing out of the gospel and a sincere love for Christ. 

But despite its limitations, I believe that the BCO is a gift to God’s church that, though imperfect and frail, could’ve protected Mars Hill against some of the excesses of Mark Driscoll’s abusive leadership.

Here are just a few examples:

  • In recordings, Mark Driscoll boasted that he had never been a member of a church or attended seminary before starting Mars Hill. But imagine if he had heeded the wisdom of BCO 18-1, which says, “A candidate for the ministry is a member of the Church in full communion who, believing himself to be called to preach the Gospel, submits himself to the care and guidance of the Presbytery in his course of study and of practical training to prepare himself for this office.” Could this have taught him humility and godly submission? 

  • Mark Driscoll was clearly recognized as arrogant and domineering from the beginning of his ministry, as the podcast recounts. But imagine if those around him had heeded the wisdom of BCO 8-2, which says, “He that fills this office should possess a competency of human learning and be blameless in life, sound in the faith and apt to teach. He should exhibit a sobriety and holiness of life becoming the Gospel. He should rule his own house well and should have a good report of them that are outside the Church.” Could this have made a difference?

  • Mark Driscoll never submitted to anyone in a meaningful way. In fact, Driscoll said that he couldn’t submit to anyone whose church was smaller than his own. But imagine if he had taken the vow of BCO 21-5 to submit to the brethren in the Lord. Could that have made a difference?

  • And once things started to go south at Mars Hill, the elders lost their authority. They had no higher court of appeal. But what if they had a presbytery (BCO 42)? What if higher courts had been reviewing the minutes and procedures of Mars Hill (BCO 40)? Could that have made a difference?

Of course, I could give may more examples. But I hope you understand—I’m not saying that the BCO is the answer to all the Church’s problems. At the most basic level, we need the Bible alone. We need the gospel. We need love for God and love for neighbor. And there are faithful Bible-believing churches without the BCO. 

But as Presbyterians, we should be thankful for the BCO. It’s a gift of God, unpacking the wisdom of God’s Word. We are privileged to possess a book that has been so carefully written and revised throughout history.  And as a pastor, one of my goals is to read through the Book of Church Order more regularly. I want to be thoroughly acquainted with this wise book so that it will be a lifeline for the church when it faces conflict and challenges. And rather than constantly trying to reinvent the church, we should all look to the wisdom of the past. We should look to the wise foundation of the Reformed tradition as reflected in the BCO.  

As a friend said a few years ago, perhaps BCO means “Beautiful Church Order.”


The Gospel in a Folk Tale: “The Tortoise and the Wisdom of the World”

Logic and arguments can sometimes skim over the surface of my mind and skip over the deep parts of my heart. Story, though, even the kind I read to my four year old, pierces me with deep knowledge, the kind that changes you. And if I mull on it, the Gospel is always at the heart of this kind of change. 

The story this time was a fable from Africa I had never read before. Entitled “The Tortoise and the Wisdom of the World,” it is a tale of a tortoise who, because he is wise, decides to make sure that he truly is the wisest creature in the universe. He does this by roaming the whole earth, storing up the wisdom in a gourd that he carried with him. Once he has collected enough wisdom, he thinks, he will certainly be the wisest. 

At last, he rounds out his collection of wisdom; and, not wanting to lose something so precious, he wisely decides to hide it in a tree. I’ll excerpt to get the details right: 

He decided to hide the gourd at the top of a very tall palm tree. To get to the top, he hung the gourd on his neck and tied a rope around himself and the tree to haul himself up. But the gourd was between him and the tree trunk making it difficult to climb. He would make a little progress and slide right back down. Meanwhile, a snail who was passing by had stopped to watch the tortoise. After watching the tortoise slide down the tree yet again, the snail suggested, “Why don’t you throw the gourd behind you instead of hanging it in front?”

The tortoise tried this and easily climbed to the top of the tree. Then he realized how futile his effort was. He had collected all the wisdom in the world, yet the snail had proven wiser than him. He threw the gourd onto the ground where it broke into several pieces allowing all the wisdom in it to escape back into the world. 

This is when the story hit my heart. How often have I, like the tortoise, been growing in knowledge of God and in His wisdom, but been derailed by comparison? When I find myself on social media or even talking to a mom who is making a different parenting choice than me, I find myself questioning my own choices and trying to add on their way of living, even if it isn’t something God has truly worked on my heart, or if it doesn’t fit with our family culture. I treat my freedom in Christ as if it does not exist, and I take on weight of the law of other’s lifestyle. Like the turtle, this makes me tempted to scrap everything, and throw myself down in a petty heap on the floor. 

Through the truth of the Gospel, God meets us in this moment of vulnerability and comparison and shame. Christ took upon himself the pride we take in our flimsy knowing, and died to break its power!! HE ROSE AGAIN that we might be free to walk in a new kind of wisdom, one so free from fear and competition that through it we can laugh joyously at the discovery of another’s greater wisdom, and humbly at its own foolish moments. 

And even if we, like the turtle, compare ourselves to others and give up on our wisdom and the freedom we live out in Christ again and again, God will restore us to freedom and humility. Let us turn to him in repentance and remember again the Jesus who walked among people and never rejected their foolishness (but only the wisdom they held tight in pride).


A Scientist Considers the Origin of Life

The origin of life (OOL) may be the most significant unsolved problem in science, spanning the fields of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, mathematics, information science, and philosophy. Researchers studying the OOL seek explanations and evidence for how lifeless earth, water, air, and fire followed a chain of events starting with “a warm little pond” of simple chemicals to become the extremely complex and diverse living creatures in the world today, with each step along the way conforming to all scientific laws. News headlines may lead you to believe that we are on the verge of solving the mystery of how life began. Discoveries of water on other planets, complex organic chemicals on meteorites, exoplanets in the “Goldilocks zone,” and laboratory syntheses of biochemical materials from simple building blocks each seem to be the next piece of the puzzle to end all doubt about how creation occurred without a Creator. Nothing could be further from the truth. Perhaps the only agreement within the OOL community is that after a century of research, scientists are further away than ever from reaching a consensus on how life began, and they are clearly seeing how much complexity is necessary for even the simplest living cell. As one OOL scientist admitted in 2010, “Our ignorance about the origin of life is profound—not just some simple missing mechanistic detail.”

While the OOL topics are complicated, it is worth knowing a few details because the more science you know, the more clearly you will see that creation without a Creator is impossible. Here are a handful of the unresolved controversies necessary to propose a merely naturalistic OOL theory. What were the early earth conditions: temperature, sunlight, atmosphere, salinity, pH, etc.? Was the OOL a singular event (origin) or a coherent plurality of events (origins)? Did life originate on earth or somewhere else (panspermia)? What are the sources of homochirality in sugars and amino acids? How did biopolymers (DNA, RNA, proteins) form in the early earth? How were chemicals concentrated to facilitate biosynthesis (the dilution problem)? How were vulnerable biochemical materials protected from hydrolysis and degradation? Which came first: genetics or metabolism? What is the source of the information encoded in genetic material? What is life? Is life an emergent property?

Today, we see lifeless chemical compounds and we see living cellular organisms whose parents were living creatures, i.e. life giving rise to life. We have no evidence for any collections of semi-living chemicals between these extremes; either now or from the past. As with evolution, a detailed theory of OOL remains elusive, but many scientists enthusiastically and optimistically still persist in the belief that naturalistic answers will eventually be found. Other scientific disciplines accept the actions of an intelligent agent as the best explanation of the evidence including the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI), archeology, cryptography, and forensics. In these fields, once all possible natural explanations for the observations and evidence are eliminated, some other explanation must be pursued, i.e. the action of an intelligent being. With some notable exceptions, the OOL community is not ready to accept the role of a Creator in the origin of life.

Christians spend much time fighting over the proper interpretation of Genesis 1 and 2. Let’s not lose sight of key teachings in Genesis that we all agree upon. God created everything. Everything He created was good. God created everything with the precision of an engineer and the beauty of an artist. And Genesis is not the only Scripture that reveals God the Creator. “God is the builder of everything.” (Hebrews 3) “My help comes from the Lord, the Maker of heaven and earth.” (Psalm 121) “For by [Jesus] all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through Him and for Him.” (Colossians 1) “The Lord is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth.“ (Isaiah 40) “The universe was created by the word of God.” (Hebrews 11) “The heavens declare the glory of God, the sky above proclaims His handiwork.” (Psalm 19) “All things were made through [Jesus], and without Him was not anything made that was made.” (John 1) “For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day.” (Exodus 20) 

We have no reason to fear the science, and every reason to praise our great Creator. If someone tries to intimidate you with science, just remember that the people who do OOL research for a living admit that they have no answers. Be strong and courageous when discussing how life began with unbelievers. Patiently and graciously ask questions, especially if someone knows more science than you do. We have nothing to defend. We are just called to proclaim the truth. Your questions and interest might cause them to rethink what they believe. Your conversation might leave them with a few thoughts that the Holy Spirit will use for them to see God as the Creator and Jesus as the Savior and Lord.


Is There Anything New We Can Learn from David’s Battle with Goliath? (1 Samuel 17)

A quick internet survey provides many life lessons from David’s battle with Goliath including (i) be bigger than your fears, (ii) size doesn’t matter, (iii) make use of what you already have, (iv) believe victory is possible, (v) don’t underestimate your capabilities, (vi) pick the right tools for victory, and (vii) ignore experts who say you’re not up to the task. There’s almost always one thing missing from these life lessons: Jesus, the one who the Bible is all about. If we want to read the Bible as a Christian, we must see how the David and Goliath story is part of God’s redemptive history that all points to Jesus. A faithful reading of the Old and New Testaments finds the Gospel in every verse, not merely a collection of inspiring stories that would be appropriate for a motivational speaker.

After forty days of taunting God and His people, the Philistines met Israel again on the battlefield with the fate of their people at stake. Goliath was a champion soldier who was so big that he had custom-made armor and weapons. No one from Israel had stepped up to fight him, even with enticements of fame and fortune from King Saul. No one in the army thought David could be of any use in the battle. He had not even been enlisted to cook, fetch water, or clean up after the troops. As a child, he was not even trained to use any battle weapons. But David did not just show up that day unprepared. David had faithfully cared for and watched over his sheep, protecting them from small threats to increasingly deadly threats from bears and lions. His faithfulness in small matters prepared him for this significant battle. The stakes were high that day. If David had been killed, none of his descendants would have been born, including Jesus. After David stepped onto the battlefield and killed Goliath, the battle wasn’t over, but Israel’s victory was secured. 

Since Genesis 3, there has been an on-going spiritual battle between God’s people and the forces of evil. When David defeated Israel’s enemy, he foreshadowed Christ who defeated death and the devil at the cross. Like David, Jesus didn’t just show up one day at the cross. Jesus spent a lifetime learning faithfulness and obedience, daily seeking the grace and strength of God. In His final hours, Jesus did what no other god could do: He displayed incredible courage. He could have walked away. He could have called an army of angels to rescue Him. But instead He remained obedient to His Father’s will through a terrible and terrifying ordeal. While Jesus secured victory against sin and death, the battle is not over. God’s people are still commanded to stand up against the forces of evil. Being faithful and doing what is right in the face of fear, threats, danger, and suffering is so important to God that the cowardly and the faithless lead the list of sinners who will suffer the second death in the lake of fire. (Revelation 21) 

Today may be your day to face a significant life battle. Or today may be another day to be faithful in small matters as you prepare for some major, future conflict. Spiritual battles and worldly conflicts occur in our homes, at work, at school, in our neighborhoods, between friends, and with our enemies. These spiritual fights also occur in our own hearts. They damage relationships. They harm society. They have a supernatural dimension (ex. Job 1). If you’ve been sitting on the bench and watching from the sidelines, it’s time to join the fight. If you’ve been fighting for the losing side, it’s time to follow Jesus and join the God who promises that His people will overcome sin, wickedness, and evil, and celebrate an eternal victory with Him in Heaven.


Book Recommendation--Disruptive Witness: Speaking Truth in a Distracted Age by Alan Noble

The gospel is not a personal preference. In “Disruptive Witness”, Alan Noble explains how the growth of alternative belief systems and of activities that provide immediate gratification make the Christian worldview seem like just another lifestyle choice. Once again, the Church’s challenge is to understand and overcome the world’s latest opposition to hearing and comprehending the good news of Jesus Christ. Noble asks us to consider a typical Sunday morning. After sleeping in a climate-controlled home in a comfortable bed, your alarm wakes you. You check your smartphone as you eat a delicious, healthy breakfast. After a hot shower, you dress in clean, comfortable clothes for the drive to church in a modern car on safe, paved roads. During worship, you sing songs and pray about God’s provision, mercy, and grace. But most of your experiences on that morning (and throughout the week) testify to human ingenuity and man’s control over the world. Providence, mystery, and wonder have been largely removed from our thoughts. We need to stop accepting the world’s way of thinking which trivializes the Christian faith. We must repent and shift our affections from creature-comforts and technology to the Creator and Lord of all. Then will we be better equipped to explain the hope of the Gospel in a way that doesn’t sound like we’re just “speaking our truth.” 

Thankfulness has a profound way of realigning our desires and our appreciation of God. Consistently saying grace before a meal (both in private and in public) is a reminder that the food we have is a gift from God to who provides for us because He is kind, and He loves us. Gratitude acknowledges that everything we have is by God’s grace and is one example of a disruptive witness. Another example is delighting in the beauty of the natural world all around us. A sunset. A tree. A storm. A bird. Pausing for a moment allows us to recognize the beauty of creation and draw our attention toward God. An effective disruptive witness cannot be faked for long. Our thoughts and feelings toward God must be an honest expression of what’s in our heart.

Noble makes a strong case that corporate worship cannot be merely about learning Scripture, theology, or any other important aspect of the Christian faith. When the worship service becomes too educationally focused and the sermon resembles a classroom lecture, people will gradually stop gathering on Sunday because they can learn from books, YouTube sermons, podcasts, and a variety of excellent resources at a time and place that better fits their schedule and individual interests. Also people will eventually reach a point where they have learned enough about Christianity, and they will move on to something else. The responsibility for maintaining focus during the corporate time of worship resides with both church leaders and congregants. The gathering of the saints must be about nurturing our love for God, building relationships, and serving our neighbors. In these fellowship times we can both give and receive God’s grace within our Christian community. As Jesus said, our love for God and for one another will be an undeniable and disruptive witness to the world that we are His disciples (John 13). Our time together should “stir up one another to love and good works” in a way that leaves the world wanting to know more about our good, loving, and beautiful God (Hebrews 10).

Why Do We Pray before Meals?

Why do we pray before meals? Is it simply a valuable practice of mindfulness, as Emily Heil seems to indicate in a recent Washington Post article? Is it merely a quaint ritual or a man-made tradition? And most importantly, what does the Bible teach us?

First and foremost, we pray before meals because of the example of Jesus. In Matthew 14:19, Jesus “looked up to heaven and said a blessing” before feeding the 5000. And we see Jesus giving thanks before a meal in Matthew 26:26. But one of the most overlooked texts on this topic is 1 Timothy 4:1-5, which I want to explore with you today.

Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, through the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, for it is made holy by the word of God and prayer.

According to the apostle Paul, false teachers will arise who have seared consciences and operate under the influence of demonic power. They will lead people to “depart from the faith” through legalistic prohibitions. They will “forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods.” In other words, these false teachers will be religious ascetics who peddle false doctrine dressed up in faux pietism, which includes legalistic dietary restrictions.

But in verses 4-5, Paul tells us why these legalistic dietary restrictions are unbiblical and fly in the face of God who created food “to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth.” 

  • First, everything created by God is good (Genesis 1:31). Paul affirms the inherent goodness of the physical world because a good God created it. And if the physical world is good, then Christians shouldn’t reject anything “if it is received with thanksgiving.” Yes, God imposed certain dietary restrictions in the Old Testament. But through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, we have returned to the creational order that was reiterated in Genesis 9:3, where God told Noah, “Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. And as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything.”

  • Second, our food is “made holy by the word of God and prayer.” That’s striking! Though we can affirm the goodness of all created things, Paul implies that apart from the word of God and prayer, food would still be unclean in some mysterious way. It would be “unsanctified.” Therefore, part of the reason we pray before meals is to give thanks for the inherent goodness of God’s created order. But we also give thanks in order to sanctify our food – to bless the food to our bodies and our bodies to God’s service, as the traditional prayer goes.

Therefore, I would encourage you to reflect on 1 Timothy 4:5 the next time you sit down for a meal. God has given you this food to be received with thanksgiving. It is good as part of God’s creation. But the food is only made holy through the word of God and prayer. So, let us hold fast to the word of God. Let us hold fast to prayer. Let us dedicate our food to the Lord and our bodies to his service. As Paul says elsewhere, “So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Corinthians 10:31).


This Is the Way

When my father died several years ago, my brother and I went through boxes of papers and photos to make sure we had dad’s affairs in order.  We were surprised to find a receipt for the purchase of a house.  The date aligned with a year that our family moved, but it was not for the house we moved to.  The house in question was in a different town and within a different school district. The trajectory of our lives would have shifted dramatically to include an alternate group of friends, summer jobs, teachers, guidance counselors, and neighbors.  I will never know what circumstances interrupted that sale; but I know it was a pivot point in our lives.

I am confident that our Good Shepherd guided our path and my parents’ choice at the time.  We know from Isaiah 30:21 that God directs our paths, “And your ears shall hear a word behind you, saying, ‘This is the way, walk in it,’ when you turn to the right or when you turn to the left.”  David also assured us in Psalm 23:2, “He leads me in paths of righteousness for his name’s sake.”  In Psalm 80:1, Asaph calls out, “Give ear, O Shepherd of Israel, you who lead Joseph like a flock.”

This is only one decision point I know about.  How many other times in each of our lives has the Lord gently moved us in his chosen direction?  Reflecting over the decades I can identify some key turning points where God’s will later became obvious.  Isn’t it marvelous to pause in absolute wonder and gratitude to think about those many moments when we are guided by our shepherd without any awareness!  

I can also recall moments of intense struggle when I sought direction, much like Gideon wanting a sign from God.  Aimee Byrd wrote about why we do not hear a voice from heaven giving instructions: 

But that is not the way God has ordained us to grow in faith.  While he does lead us by his Spirit, we do not hear direct revelation.  And it is only after the fact that I can look back and confirm that, yes, that was the work of the Spirit that prompted me in that direction.  One thing that I can know for sure is that the Spirit never operates apart from his Word” (No Little Women: Equipping All Women in the Household of God, p.235).

People in our culture celebrate coincidence, Kismet, karma, or fate for good jobs or happy relationships. They innately recognize when circumstances come together that are out of their control.  How very sad that they do not know that they are enjoying blessings from their generous God.  As Matthew 5:25 reminds us, “For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.” Would that they directed their appreciation and gratitude to the loving Lord! 

On New Year’s Day, Dayspring.com posted a Facebook message asking, “Who is God calling you to be in 2022?” The answer is simple: me.  He is calling me to be the person he has loved and guided through this earthly sojourn.  He is calling me to continue following where he leads.


Why Minimalism Needs the Gospel of Jesus Christ

The root of minimalism as it’s usually taught is incompatible with the Gospel, but it can be replanted into the soil of the Scripture! 

Minimalism makes some big promises. Among them–having fewer things will–in itself free our minds and hearts to love and connect with others in more meaningful ways. It posits: get rid of anything that is not essential to your life, and you will be able to incorporate meaning into your life. Many of its teachers actually make all the promises that religions make: follow this system and you will experience greater happiness and freedom. Jennifer Barnick, a blogger who has researched the movement said:

“I’m all for the reduction of clutter in your home, the clamping down on mindless spending, and not trying to keep up with the more equals better equals self-esteem equation.  However, it becomes clear they are preaching that Minimalism can solve depression, anxiety, and can give one a sense of purpose and happiness.  That is the bad: the movement is being sold as a religion and not as a good practical virtue to weave into your life. Why is making Minimalism a religion that will cure all of your ills bad?  Why is making Minimalism a religion that will cure all of your ills bad?  It is bad because Minimalism will not cure your depression, anxiety, or give you a sense of purpose and happiness.”

Minimalism can be confusing to Christians because it does offer a fresh start in ways that echo the Gospel and remind us of what is true. It asks its practitioners to make hard choices about what they truly value in life and how to line up your life with those values more intentionally. Hebrews tells us to “throw off the sin that so easily encumbers” (Heb 12:1). Some minimalists say, “throw off whatever is keeping you from being happy,” but Joshua Field Millburn and Ryan Nicodemus, in their book and podcasts have a slightly different brand of minimalism: “throw off whatever is keeping you from living a meaningful life, a present life, a life that is connected fully with others.” They are branding minimalism as a new kind of religion, a religion that will grant you freedom from your anxiety and depression. 

Jesus also teaches a bit, like Millburn and Nicodemus, that it is easier for a camel to get through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to see past the number of his possessions and importance he places on his own role in life to even see his need for the Gospel. Minimalism asks: isn’t everyone in middle-class America a Rich Man? Aren’t we all blinded by ads and shopping and caring for the stuff we already have? And yes, we are!  However, minimalism’s diagnosis is limited, although accurate. Minimalism does not see that our love of things is all tangled up in the other bad things we are unable to stop loving, or the good thing we are incapable of loving enough to pursue them: it’s our sin and fundamental brokenness that’s at the root of materialism and consumerism, not the other way around. 

Now, although minimalism actually promises many of the same things that Jesus and Paul were speaking about in the New Testament (freedom, joy, and peace, to name a few), I think it may be rewarding to dig in a little and see that following minimalism actually doesn’t result in the same kind of freedom. According to Barnick,

“It will work for a while—especially if you go all out and quit your job, get rid of all of your stuff, and perhaps build a tiny house on wheels.  Of course, it will work for a while—just like binge buying or drinking or falling in love—while you are in the adventure of mania you will not feel depression or anxiety.  You will have a wild sense of purpose and people usually feel euphoric when high—that’s why drugs and religious movements draw in masses of people.  However, people will and do come down.”

Minimalism offers initial freedom, because the feeling of moral release from possessions that only remind you of your failures or that only weigh on you with no reward–all of that is gone. But then what is there?  Barnick “spent hours watching “Why I’m no longer a Minimalist” videos on YouTube. One of the saddest videos was of a young woman who admitted that Minimalism taken to the extreme, had made her feel ‘sad,’ ‘burdened,’ ‘stuck,’ ‘guilty,’ and ‘unable to express herself anymore.’ The truth is, for the people who pursued Minimalism to free themselves from despair, stress, and meaninglessness found they ended up a little worse off than when they began. In other words, like all manias, “there is a Minimalist hangover.” 

Barnick’s explanation clearly shows that minimalism isn’t freedom. It’s the same old Law that Jesus came to free us from. Jesus came to break the power that sin gives to the law: power to condemn us, to point a finger at all the ways we are still falling short. Jesus took that finger in his heart when he died on the cross. Now all the laws–the Mosaic law, as well as the law of minimalism–we can be freed from. Instead of feeling the guilt of not living up to another self-help book (or makeover show for that matter), the Gospel helps us walk in wholeness, and embrace our lives and those around us, no matter what they happen to look like at the moment. God will enter and change us as we learn to live in that truth more and more. 

There is one last connection, though, with minimalism. One of the things that God often does in the lives of Christians is give them a different relationship with our things. We may have been afraid of not having enough before, but trusting God can make us able to embrace others by sharing our food, possessions, and money. If we pray that God will show us how, He is certain to show us the way to break the hold that money and possessions have over our hearts. Let’s live into that and see what kind of freedom God can give us from our things. Let’s ask him for opportunities to reach our ears, grab our hearts, and move our hands.

How to Pray Through A Seizure: Part I (The Great Physician)

*Warning: This is RJ Wiechecki’s honest discussion of his life leading up to and recovering from brain surgery. At times, strong and emotional language is used, including discussion of suicide.

I had lunch on December 29th, 2021 with two friends from church, Steve and Sue, to catch up and celebrate my resumed life driving again. The married couple asked me where I would like to travel across the world with my tiny home now so close to completion. I told them I had dreams of going down to Tennessee up in Appalachia to study Hillbilly culture for a while. There’s little difference between the recitation of Shakespeare and the comprehension of the local dialect. The isolated community helped preserve the language over the past four hundred years. I wanted to learn that. The second place I wanted to go is Puerto Rico to study Spanish. I have friends, I told them, who live in mountains where I could park for the winter months. Then I said I’d take my truck and trailer on the open road across the continental United States. My grandfather, dad and I took a similar road trip between the summer of my freshman and sophomore year of college. Lo and behold! That would be my last trip with my grandfather. He died in hospice at our house six months later from a brain tumor the size of a grapefruit pressing up against either side of his lobes. Emotionally he was not doing so well the last three years of his life. My Pop-Pop suffered the loss of his daughter, my paternal aunt, from a brain aneurysm when she was twenty-three. He didn’t talk to my grandmother for the last three years of their marriage. By day, he was a workaholic at his local scrap yard seven days a week, and for those last few years at night he was an alcoholic: often he walked into the house drunk from the bar where he worked and drank Southern Comfort until he snored himself to sleep. He swore off alcohol over my aunt’s grave. He started to drink again once the tumor reached a certain size, my guess, smaller than an orange but bigger than a golf ball. Yet I’m speculating well after the fact.

My other aunt too had a brain tumor, two in fact, ten years removed from one another on the mom’s side of the family. I watched her come home after her first surgery. I remember her swollen eyes. The surgeons had to pull back the layers of skin off of her face to penetrate the tumor and remove it. People at the hospital confused her as a battered domestic abuse victim. Those bruises around her eyes and blood clot knotted in her hair haunted me so much that about three and a half years ago, I began working on a novel concerning a missing-pastor-in-action. He too had a brain tumor. I was writing it as a tragedy. Spoiler Alert: he remains in coma after surgery and he dies in act III.

June 19th, 2021. I was at home. I was working at the kitchen counter sitting up on a high stool. I had been working on a Google Analytics course for a mobile small business editing others’ work in their preparations for their own publication. I had been getting some headaches a few months prior. I blamed it on the coffee I quit back in January of that year. I started to feel my body getting weaker. I could barely do twenty push ups without my one arm giving way at times. I went to a chiropractor and practiced meditation. I even hired a yoga instructor! I looked for any alternative treatment available. If anyone could reign this minor problem into control, it would be me, I thought. Just a kink in my alignment I rationalized. Also, just a month before, I had stepped out of my prior job working machinery to take on my editing business full time. I was making some dumb and obvious mistakes on the machines I know I shouldn’t have made with the skill sets I had. I interpreted it as my subconscious mind trying to sabotage myself. It was time to branch out.  Something was trying to tell me to make a career switch. So I did. I stepped out of that role and took on more entrepreneurial pursuits. Also, close to three years ago, I moved in with my parents to build a tiny home. At the time of June 19th, the structure was 80% complete. My life was a solid 80% complete. A few months more to go, and I would have a mobile business and living debt free in a tiny home. Life went according to my plan as I saw fit. I was in control. On that same day, a close friend of mine, Jonathan and I were heading out to the beach, but we pushed forward our plans, not that Saturday but the following Saturday. I offered to drive. Thank God I wasn’t driving on the road that day with him.

It was afternoon then. In the midst of taking my notes in my journal indexed as book 11 and page 67, I found myself trying to talk to myself. It was at that moment I was unable to speak. All I could say was ba- ba- ba- ba- b- b-. The harder I gripped for control, the worse this rocking back and forth. There was loud ringing in my ears. The noise screamed in my eardrums. It had a pulse similar to a seizure I wrote in a fictional scene a year or so prior. I rocked back and forth. Why can’t I control this!!!!! The journal and the table blurred out of focus. Bam!

I had just finished foaming from the mouth, and I woke up in a pile of my own blood. The high stool chair crashed one into another. Next thing I knew I had my father sitting next to me. The paramedics came knocking at our door. One of them, a man, asked if my father was drunk. No. His tendency is to faint at the sight of blood. Blamed it on my mother giving birth to me. I was surprised he too wasn’t passed out right next to me. I saw my own blood in a towel pressed up against my skull. Did I fall on my head? Must have. It wasn’t the first time. At six years old, I got nine stitches across the bottom of my chin from a bowling ball. No different here I thought. It would be some Urgent-Care-and-stitch-me-up matter. I argued with the paramedic team after the man in particular told me they needed me to go by ambulance to the hospital. I told them, “No, it was just a bad fall. Really! That’s all. Please don’t take me to a doctor to get checked out.” 

The first words that ever came out of my mouth, I was four-and-a-half years old. My aunt JoAnn, the one who died from the brain aneurysm, told my mom that RJ will talk when he is ready. She died two weeks after my third birthday. The video camera had me hiding from Barney the big friendly dinosaur. I had three fears at that age: dinosaurs, people wearing matching outfits to me and medical authority. A year and a half later, my mother had me sitting that day around the dining room table. At that point she grew either ever more impatient or ever more persistent with me not talking. She tried a different tactic. She couldn’t bribe me with either macaroni and cheese or ice cream, which my sister very much enjoyed. No, she would use negative reinforcement instead: my mother warned me, “If you don’t start talking now, then you leave with no other choice but to send you to the doctor.”

I blurted out, “No! Not the doctor.”

“Ha! You can talk!” My mother shouted.

And so I could talk; however, much of my early childhood was spent talking to myself around the perimeters of the school yard during recess. I took speech therapy class until I had run my course in the fifth grade. I couldn’t organize and communicate my thoughts to other people. I started one sentence. I started another. And I finished another. I was an organizational mess, but my thoughts were all there conceptualized and stored up somewhere in my head. The ideas were there. The expression was not. I also had grown a great fear for the red line of the page when my mother corrected my writing. She had me read out loud word-for-word every error, spelling mistake as it was written on paper (not how it was conceptualized in my head). I cried a lot during our fourth grade night sessions together, but I did do a lot better in my language arts class.

My first dream when I was either six or seven was to become an artist. Later this dream was transformed into an aspiration to write with the written word as my art, enough so, years later, I would take my editing business in preparation to get on the road with a full on mobile remote editing business and meanwhile working on my own craft in private.

Back to June 19th, I laid waiting in a hospital bed in an ER room. I informed my friend, Jonathan, I might be missing church service the following morning. I also told a SCORE mentor that I would be taking a few days off for some minor personal health concerns. No biggie. First, I was rolled off for a cat scan, and then a few hours later, I was taken for an MRI scan. 

The medical doctor came back with a diagnosis. I had a brain tumor on my right frontal lobe the size of a golf ball. It dealt mainly with more creative and abstract higher levels of thinking. The neurosurgeon advised me to go ahead and remove the tumor promising that the symptoms were mild, suffering at most some short term memory loss. I’d be out of the hospital two, maybe three, days tops after the operation. My short term memory would be as sharp if not better a year from now. The man was rather blasé about the procedure and told me that there’s nothing to worry about. He said, “It’s nothing worse than getting a gallbladder removed.” I had a 90% chance of recovery from the operation, and I would be out of the hospital within the next two or three days. That neurosurgeon though he had a cold bedside manner still oversold the sizzle of my expectation for the procedure.

I prayed with Will Stern, my pastor at Hope Church, along with my mother and father. I made fun of his big protruding ears jutting out from either side of his face like an elephant. He read from the book of Isaiah 40:28-31.

28 Do you not know?
    Have you not heard?
The Lord is the everlasting God,
    the Creator of the ends of the earth.
He will not grow tired or weary,
    and his understanding no one can fathom.
29 He gives strength to the weary
    and increases the power of the weak.
30 Even youths grow tired and weary,
    and young men stumble and fall;
31 but those who hope in the Lord
    will renew their strength.
They will soar on wings like eagles;
    they will run and not grow weary,
    they will walk and not be faint. 

After the pastor did his prayer thing and my parents left the room, I thought I was ready to meet my Maker. Death is only a tragedy for the living I thought. And this was simply another leap of faith. I jumped.

I cracked a couple jokes to the anesthesiologist about going under to Hades, and if there would be anyone in hell she would like to say hi to. She laughed and asked me to count back from 100. I started. 100… 99… 98… 97… I lost count under the glimpse of bright lights.

It was a six-and-a-half-hour procedure. The whole medical staff came out to greet my parents. My mother assumed the worst and presumed that meant I was pronounced dead. The team looked a bit traumatized themselves. They told my parents I had two more seizures during surgery while they were separating the tissue. I just so happened to be an ill-fated patient during a board game of Operation who got zapped in the noggin one too many times.

Like most of my endeavors, I jumped into projects with a lot of blind faith. It was the whole falling to the scene of the crash I didn’t like. What surprised me more was not that I would meet my Heavenly Father, but that I woke up with a breathing tube lodged down my throat. I kept having to remind myself to breathe. Breathe! Damn it, breathe! In the most mechanical way, air was pumped in and out of my lungs. There is a Greek word for breath, wind or spirit πνεύματος (pneumatos). I thought about this word as I choked on my own vomit. My throat was sore and raspy. I struggled not only with the Spirit but battled the pneumatic machine. I could hear my mother’s voice asking me if she could hear me. I open my own swollen eyes. I wasn’t dead. It wasn’t Heaven, I thought. This surely must be Hell.

And Hell it was. Half of my body was paralyzed on my left side including my leg, arm, and hand. My face also drooped over to the left. I was left unconscious in a medically-induced coma for three days. And I had great indignation and unholy rage in the Neuro ICU room. I counted life not by days or hours but seconds of pain. I slurred out “more drugs” unsure whether I meant “no more drugs” or “more drugs.” Before this, I didn’t even take an Advil for a headache. Choosing to not take a pill was something in my control. Even now while writing this, I am unsure how much medication they had me on. Whatever the medication they gave me wasn't enough. The worst drugs I got while at Crozer Medical Hospital were steroids. Roid rage was and is a real condition. Inflation swelling did go down, but the anger I had was borderline demonic. Those inner demons take a hold on the drug-induced body. I had hit a certain pain threshold and tried to kill myself with my good arm by beating as hard as I could against my chest. My mother stopped me. I signaled my mother the middle finger (my good hand of course) and repeated the mantra out loud, “I want to die. Kill me. Give me two bullets in the head. C’mon shoot me.” I imagined smoke coming off of my middle finger gun as I threatened to pull the trigger. Boom! Later my mother reported to me that she had to pull off the side of the road and broke into tears after what I said to her over and over again. I repeated the phrase for hours.

During one of my death chants that evening, my father gave me a choice: get better or get worse. It was my choice and no one else’s. That was just a conversation between me and God. I hadn’t made up my mind until the midnight hour had come to pass. It had been several days since my last bowel movement. Two nurses, one male and another female, went about their casual conversation as they stripped me down naked to perform an enema. I felt raw and exposed to a most Holy God where my right hand didn’t know what the left hand was doing. I was a babe, a coward, a sinner, a mixture of sorrow and circumstance, filled with a sense of neurological delusion and revelation. There I lay before God as an embarrassed archetypal Adam. Mind you, I also had spent a lot of time watching Naked and Afraid episodes on the rather limited hospital cable television. I laughed as fluid shot up into my rectum and up into my colon. I had an uncontrollable smile on my face, nervous from indecision. I would later refer to this as my retarded smile. The self critic says it. When looking into the mirror the muscle around the left eye is weaker than those on the right. Others might have a hard time noticing the difference until such a feature is mentioned. I noticed things like that because as long as I could remember I have been on a search for control: control in my speech, control in my mannerism, control in my voice. I made a whole aesthetic theory around controlling each and every syllable of my writing. What I lacked most during my helpless state was any control. The thought: if I could describe it, I could control what otherwise is unexplainable.  If I could articulate the finer points of theology, for instance, I could dismiss it and fog on how Proverbs is a bunch of generic garbage. (I still think so by the way—neither the opinion nor stance of Hope Church, although I do not question the infallibility of God’s Holy Word, however generic that truth may be.) Nonetheless, I was laying there open and splayed out. Half of me was unable to speak, unable to walk, and unable to move. The idea was there, but the expression was not. All of the adversity I had to overcome as a child flooded back into my present. That evening without the words to describe them, I wished to describe God again in the awe and mystery I once conceived in my mind as a child. I was reminded of the Gospel of John’s introduction: “The Word was God and God was the Word.” Something transcendent happened. Or I was so happy my bowels were relieved. Either way, I would get better. I chose to search not for words but the Word, in other words, a divine purpose.

I would remain at the Neuro ICU for the next seven days. Friends would call on me and hear my drugged up voice repeat the same three to four phrases. “We are all sinners in the eyes of an angry God” and “Pride before the Folly.” I repeated them because they were one of the few phrases I could remember. I wasn’t stupid or at least I pretend my best not to be. I was lucky to remember what college I spent four years attending, let alone being one up for any semblance of conversation concerning any of my classes, friends, and antidotes. Here I was in complete and utter pain, and it was some of the closest moments I had ever felt to a universal love and compassion for my fellow man. I saw others as lost and helpless like me, fallen from grace each in their own way. I loved them similar to how Christ loved me.

On my last day at Crozer Medical Hospital, I made it to the step down unit. My father sat next to me and handed me a milkshake. It was the first real food they offered me there besides the awful mashed boiled carrots they were starving me on. I dropped 18 lbs that week. All of the drugs in the world could not satiate the comforts of a slurry of ice cream mixed with chocolate syrup. That and I requested my mother make gluten-free fettuccine alfredo. My mother had gone on a hunting spree to numerous stores to find this otherwise obsolete pasta addition. I ate with my good arm. 

Eating my meal with my good arm, I confessed to my dad. I told him I didn’t want to live like this anymore. I wanted to write again. I wanted to travel across the US with my home hitched behind. I wanted to even cut the grass in our backyard once more. Freedom. That’s the word I had a three minute delay to say out loud. I wanted to live. God, by the grace of the Great Physician, I wanted to live.

3 AM the following morning, I was shipped from one hospital to another. I would spend the next 21 days at Taylor Hospital for rehabilitation.  Due to heavy Covid restrictions, their staff allowed one and only one visitor a day. No coming in the morning and then coming back to visit later in the day. The policy was a One in, one out, and your visitation was done. My parents divided up their days. Three days it was my mom. Three days it was my dad. And I made a special request to see my friend Jonathan on a Saturday. Though it pained my parents, they obliged. Previously, nurse staff banned Jonathan from seeing me despite the fact he had a Bible in his hand. Didn’t matter. Another guy with Dumbo looking ears and thinning hair said he was a Reverent too. They thought, But who’s this guy? So Jonathan was out. 

That first Saturday, Jonathan also handed me a milkshake malt. I complained prior to the operation how block-headed it was that he had plans to go out to eat afterwards without any consideration for the guy getting brain surgery the next day. What’s wrong Goofball! I must have blocked that conversation out of my memory (although there was a text message history to prove me wrong otherwise!) He came into my rehab room clean cut and shaved. I had gotten used to his more disheveled hipster trendy look I made fun of him about often. I would tell other congregational members from my church and sometimes to his face, “He’s a schmuck, but he’s my schmuck.” Well my schmuck came here to visit me. I was so happy. He came! It was in that conversation he told me loved me and I told him he was my best friend. (Word to the wise—Solomon might have the courage to even say “Proverb”: don’t wait until someone is in the emergency room to let that inner love shine through or else it might be too late.) Then I asked him to open up to either first or second Philippians and find something about love. (Please forgive my following vulgarities. Note: I was still heaped on a large dosage of drugs far from any sense of a sober mind, let alone a mind recovering from brain surgery. Jonathan flipped through page by page of Paul’s letter to the Philippians, and by word association I flipped him the bird until he noticed me making the gesture. Words much like signs or hand signals sometimes have a stigmatization attached to them. As a young child, my mother corrected my pointing at objects with such an innocent finger.  Not that I suggest anyone go about making such a derogatory gesture, but the thought behind it counts for something. Instead of representing death, the gesture symbolized life. My outward finger represented a dove of peace and pointed toward my desire to live, to create rather than destroy. I may be projecting here, but he got what I meant to say, and he laughed.

I am reminded of Matthew 18:5 “‘Who, then, is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?’ He called a little child to him, and placed the child among them. And he said: ‘Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.’” However at the time, my child-like mind thought it was just a crude funny joke. The thought didn’t dig much deeper than that. In retrospect, I found theology comes after the awe and wonder of the divine. Even the apostle Paul described his return from the third heaven a little dumbfounded as we all are in the hands of the Great Physician. 

Although I haven’t yet answered (please wait for part two of this series), the best I can offer you is a prayer of preparation for when an emergency strikes:

May our Heavenly Father bless us even when there are things inside our control. Or even more so, may he bless us with what is far beyond our control or even our grasp of understanding. For it is not in man who is in control, but it is in God’s final judgment we stand before Him in our sin and nakedness. He is in control, not us. I need more faith, not so much in jumping, than in the grace of falling into the hands of an Almighty God.

For this I pray. Amen.


Thoughts on Mathematics and Theology

John von Neumann, a Hungarian-American, was a recognized child prodigy and polymath who made significant contributions in many areas of mathematics, physics, and computing. During World War II, von Neumann worked on the Manhattan Project, and his bomb design became the “Fat Man” weapon used at Nagasaki. Von Neumann was a thoughtful man who had many interesting reflections, including:

>  In mathematics, you never understand things; you just get used to them.

>  If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because they do not realize how complicated life is.

>  Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations. … There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.

As I read von Neumann’s quotes, I could not help but ponder how his thoughts about mathematics also apply to theology, the knowledge and study of an infinite God. Mathematics and theology have more in common than you might think. The simplest mathematical concepts can be grasped by a child. (“Would you rather have one cookie or two?”) Similarly, much of what can be known about God is plain to everyone and can be understood by a child. (Romans 1) The diversity of mathematical concepts is nearly endless, and many complex ideas are understood by only a small group of people. Theology also covers a wide range of diverse and complex concepts. Great contributions to both mathematics and theology have been done for centuries in many different cultures and languages. Sadly, experts in both subjects are tempted to pridefully parade their superior knowledge. When this happens, it is time for a humble reminder that when any of us compare what we know to the infinite amount of knowledge in these subjects, we know next to nothing. And we should be thankful to God for every good gift of understanding we do have. We only know what we know because our heavenly Father has given us minds, access to the knowledge of the past, gifted teachers, and the time to learn. (James 1)

Other thoughts about mathematics can also keep us grounded regarding our limited knowledge about an infinite God:

>  As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality. (Albert Einstein)

> What is mathematics? It is only a systematic effort of solving puzzles posed by nature. (Shakuntala Devi)

> There is no branch of mathematics, however abstract, which may not someday be applied to phenomena of the real world. (Nikolai Lobachevsky)

Once again we must live with a healthy biblical tension. We should be thankful that God has revealed so much of Himself and His created world to us, and yet compared to all that can be known, we must be humble because there is still so much more to understand. And probably much of what we think we know is only a simplified version of actual reality. Whenever we learn some new insight or are reminded of some great knowledge, we should rejoice that we get an opportunity to get closer to “thinking God’s thoughts after Him.” (Johann Kepler) One last thought from von Neumann, who was not a religious man, is worth considering, “There probably is a God. Many things are easier to explain if there is than if there isn't.” We do not worship and trust God only because He has great explanatory power. But we should not be surprised that the character of the true and living God does explain what we know about our created and divinely sustained world.